What every employer in the CKL needs to know about not returning to work, but carrying on business during COVID, including managing employees, safety obligations and what to do in COVID-related circumstances:
Employers have a duty to provide a safe and healthy workplace
Employers have a duty to protect the health and safety of their workers. Employers are required to implement preventative measures to ensure workers are not exposed to conditions which could be harmful to their health and safety while working. Failure to ensure a safe workplace can lead to liability under occupational health and safety (OH&S) legislation, including fines and penalties, and, in serious cases, criminal prosecutions and/or civil liability for employers not covered under the applicable workers’ compensation regime.
To meet their obligations to provide a safe workplace, it is imperative that employers update and implement (and in some cases post in the workplace) new health and safety policies and practices in their workplaces to address the risks associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. These policies and practices will, of course, vary from workplace to workplace, and province to province, but this guide highlights many of the common issues employers will need to address.
Most provinces have specific requirements regarding worker health and safety representatives or a joint health and safety committee comprised of management and non-management employees. There are requirements under OH&S legislation regarding the composition of safety committees and requirements regarding the frequency of safety meetings and workplace inspections, as well as record-keeping related thereto. Employers should ensure that their return to the workplace safety plans are submitted through the appropriate workplace safety processes.
Deciding whether and when to reopen a workplace
First, an employer must determine whether they can legally reopen their physical workplaces, based on current government orders and restrictions, and each province’s plan for reopening the economy. Each province is loosening restrictions, and providing varying levels of guidance, which will continue to evolve. A summary of the steps taken towards reopening by each of the provinces in Canada can be found here.
Any breach of government orders could expose an employer to fines, and potentially increased OH&S compliance risk.
Once employers have determined that they can legally reopen their physical workplaces, employers will need to consider whether their workplaces can be opened safely. This exercise consists of (i) assessing the workplace and determining whether the employer is able to satisfy its duty to provide a safe and healthy workplace by implementing controls to address the hazard of COVID-19, and (ii) implementing those controls.
Workplace controls to address the hazard of COVID-19 should align with the guidelines, mandates and orders in the employer’s jurisdiction. This guide outlines the current guidance (as of the date noted at the top of this Guide) available from authorities across Canada regarding the practical steps employers should implement to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission in the workplace. We expect all levels of governments and public health authorities will provide additional guidance over time as to additional measures employers should take to protect workers.
Assessing the COVID-19 hazard in the workplace
The first step for ensuring a safe workplace is to conduct a hazard assessment for COVID-19 transmission in the workplace, as required to comply with provincial OH&S legislation. Employers should keep in mind that they may have a duty to consult joint health and safety committees, health and safety representatives and/or unions, and seek input from employees (including joint committees and worker representatives) on where potential transmission may occur and how they think COVID-19 transmission can be controlled.
When identifying hazards and developing measures to control exposure, WorkSafeBC suggests employers conduct a walk-through of the workplace to identify specific conditions or tasks that may increase the risk of exposure of employees to COVID-19. Other workers compensation boards have issued similar guidance.
All decisions must be taken on a reasoned basis, taking into consideration governmental and public health guidance and the employer’s duty of care to its employees, and in a manner consistent with the employer’s workplace health and safety policies, including those related to safety committees discussed above. Ensuring that all decisions related to workplace health and safety are properly documented and reasonable is also important. Employers may also have a duty to post their COVID-19 return to work safety plan and/or policies on their website on in the workplace, as is the case in British Columbia and most workplaces in Ontario.
Specific considerations for ensuring a safe and healthy workplace
The safest way to keep employees from contracting or spreading COVID-19 is to eliminate or reduce physical contact between employees. This can obviously be accomplished by allowing employees to work from home or continue working from home, if possible. While we strongly suspect that effective work from home policies and procedures will be an invaluable tool for most workplaces going forward, work from home arrangements are not possible for everyone, and may not be a long-term solution that can be supported by most employers (or employees for that matter). Employers’ return to work plans should consider a staggered physical return to work, ongoing assessment of the employer’s hierarchy of controls, and evolving re-assessment of workplace hazards and policies.
As employers progress from allowing an increasing proportion of employees who are working from home to physically return to the workplace, employers should consider the following hierarchy of controls to address the identified hazards related to COVID-19 in the workplace:
-
Engineering controls (i.e., physical distancing and physical barriers)
-
Administrative controls (i.e., adjusting policies and procedures to reduce risk)
-
The use of personal protective equipment (“PPE”)
We consider these types of controls in detail below:
Physical Distancing Measures for Workplaces
Employers should implement engineering controls (i.e. measures for addressing a workplace hazard by either removing the hazard or introducing a barrier between the hazard and the worker) and administrative controls (changes in workplace policies or procedures to reduce or minimize exposure to a hazard) to ensure physical distancing requirements are maintained. Employers should keep in mind that physical distancing considerations do not only apply to interactions between employees; such considerations may also apply to interactions with customers, suppliers, patients, visitors and members of the public.
Employers could consider the following measures for reducing COVID-19-related risks in the workplace:
Category |
Key Considerations |
Limiting the number of employees and others in the workplace |
|
Encouraging physical distancing at work |
|
Limiting physical contact and minimizing interpersonal interactions |
|
Worker and workplace hygiene |
|
Preventing potentially sick employees from being at work |
|
Implementing appropriate policies |
|
Evaluate policies and procedures regularly |
|
Personal protective equipment (PPE) for employees – face masks, gloves and eye protection
Where hazards related to COVID-19 cannot be eliminated through administrative and engineering controls, employers may consider the use of PPE in the workplace. PPE, which controls the hazard at the employee level, includes measures such as face masks, gloves and eye protection. Provincial governments have advised that PPE should only be used after all other controls have been considered and all feasible measures have been implemented (for example, refer to the following guidance from the Government of Alberta and the Government of Ontario).
It is imperative that employees be trained on how to use PPE correctly, including fit, use, putting it on and taking it off, maintenance, cleaning, and disposal, as well as training on the limitations of PPE.
If PPE is necessary to control risks related to COVID-19, employers should consider what, if any, PPE the employer can provide. Regardless of the measures that are taken, it is important to ensure that safety measures are informed by governmental and public health guidance.
Requiring the use of face masks, in particular, has been a common consideration for employers contemplating a return to the physical workplace. The current advice from Canada’s Chief Medical Officer is that individuals should wear a non-medical face mask when they are unable to maintain proper physical distance from others. A non-medical mask can reduce the chance of an individual’s respiratory droplets coming into contact with others or landing on surfaces. The use of a non-medical mask is primarily to protect an employee’s co-workers, as opposed to protecting the individual wearing the mask.
The Public Health Agency of Canada recommends wearing a non-medical mask or face covering in public places, especially crowded ones, when physical distancing isn’t possible. As of the date of this guide, the province of Quebec has introduced provincial legislation requiring masks mandatory in public. Several municipal jurisdictions in Canada have also passed by-laws making face masks mandatory in public. For example, as of the date noted at the top of this Guide, in Toronto, most employees working in retail stores, grocery stores, malls and shopping plazas, restaurants and bars, recreation facilities, personal services settings, common areas in hotels, and community centres, among others, are required to wear face masks or face coverings when in public enclosed spaces (see here for information on the Toronto Mandatory Mask or Face Covering Bylaw).
Health Care Professionals have made strong recommendations for mandatory face mask coverings, and because municipalities have for the most part lead the changes by introducing mandatory face mask by-laws, changes to the applicable laws on mandatory face mask coverings are rapidly evolving and may outpace the regular updates to this publication. Accordingly, employers should contact a member of the Osler Employment & Labour group for up to date advice on applicable municipal and provincial laws regarding mandatory face mask laws in jurisdictions in which they operate.
If employees are required or encouraged to wear masks in the workplace, the employer should supply those masks. Any provision of masks to employees should be accompanied by a policy on non-medical face masks and training for employees on how to properly use a non-medical mask, as well as their limitations (as described above). Further, in workplaces where employees are required to wear masks pursuant to the Toronto Mandatory Mask or Face Covering Bylaw, the employer must:
-
Create a mask policy.
-
Communicate the mask policy to staff and customers.
-
Train staff on the policy and who is exempt.
-
Require that all staff, customers or visitors wear a mask indoors, with some exceptions, including children under two years of age, people with certain health conditions, and employees in designated areas or protected by a physical barrier.
-
Post signs at all entrances reminding everyone to wear a mask.
Note also that face masks and coverings are distinct from plastic face shields, which are generally not accepted as substitutes for non-medical masks.
The Government of Canada does not recommend N95 masks for the general public and medical masks such as the N95 are only recommended for health-care workers and people who are taking care of someone in close settings such as acute care, primary care and long-term care facilities.
Ontario’s Workers Health & Safety Centre (WHSC) notes that gloves are not always necessary but may be recommended for employees who will be in contact with someone who is ill or a surface that is contaminated. Employees should understand that gloves are not a substitute for hand hygiene (i.e. proper and frequent hand washing or using hand sanitizer) or for appropriate social distancing measures.
How to handle symptomatic employees
Employers should develop an infection prevention and control plan that includes procedures for responding when an employee, customer, or other individual present in the workplace becomes ill with symptoms of COVID-19. Such a plan could include (i) procedures for isolating and transporting the individual home if they begin showing symptoms at the workplace and (ii) steps to take if an employee or other individual tests positive for COVID-19 shortly after attending the workplace, including notifying other employees of potential exposure. Employers should also be aware that they may have an obligation to report COVID-19 transmission in the workplace to their provincial health authorities.
Employees who appear to have symptoms (for example, fever, cough, or shortness of breath) upon arrival at work or who become sick during the day should immediately be separated from other employees, customers, and visitors and sent home. If an individual does not have their own transportation, the employer should support them in arranging transportation home. Individuals should avoid taking public transit if at all possible. In fact, symptomatic or sick individuals are prohibited from taking public transit in certain provinces, including Alberta. If an employee will use a rideshare service to get home, it may be necessary to provide the employee with a mask and direct the employee to ensure that the vehicle’s windows are rolled down to improve ventilation.
If the employee is able to be tested, the employee should not be allowed to return to the workplace until the employee tests negative for COVID-19 and has completed any self-isolation period mandated by public health authorities. If the employee is unable to be tested, the employee should not return to the workplace until the employee has completed any mandated self-isolation period and is free of symptoms.
Accommodating employee requests not to return
There are a variety of unique challenges employees are facing and there are a number of reasons a worker may be unwilling or unable to return to work. Employers should consider and develop policies for the following situations:
-
Higher risk employees: Certain individuals may be at greater risk of having more severe complications if they become infected with COVID-19. According to the Government of Canada, individuals at higher risk include older adults, people with weakened immune systems, and people with medical conditions including heart disease, hypertension, lung disease, diabetes and cancer. Recommendations for higher risk employees may include implementing:
-
A self-disclosure policy whereby employees can disclose that they are at a higher risk (without disclosing any personal details or sensitive medical information).
-
Mitigation measures if the employer is or becomes aware that an employee is at higher risk (for example, working from home).
-
-
Employees with childcare issues or caring for a sick relative: In some provinces, employees are eligible for job protected leaves if they are required to provide care to a person for a reason related to COVID-19 (i.e. school closure or sickness). If an employee requests to take a certain unpaid statutory leave of absence and meets the qualifying requirements of that statutory leave, the employer must grant it and may be precluded from terminating the employee’s employment for the duration in the leave. For employees making such requests, employers may consider:
-
Permitting the employee to work from home, if possible.
-
Whether the employee is eligible for paid leave in accordance with the employer’s existing contracts, policies and practices.
-
For more details regarding statutory leaves and options for employers, please see our Quick Reference Guide for Employers.
Employees concerned about workplace safety: Subject to applicable OH&S legislation, workers have a statutory right to refuse work if the worker believes on reasonable grounds that the work constitutes a danger to the worker’s health and safety. OH&S legislation varies by jurisdiction, but requirements related to work refusals generally include the following steps:
-
the employee must report the hazard to the employer;
-
the employer must take any necessary corrective action in a timely manner to address the reported hazard;
-
if an employee believes their workplace is still unsafe, the employee may make a complaint to the OH&S authorities in their jurisdiction; and
-
OH&S officers have authority to enforce OH&S legislation in a number of ways, including conducting inspections, issuing orders, writing violation tickets and issuing administrative penalties.
Employers should consult legal counsel where an employee has exercised their right to refuse to work to inform themselves of the applicable procedure in their jurisdiction.
Other employees may have non-specific health concerns regarding the general risks associated with COVID-19, including with respect to taking public transit and other non-workplace matters. In these cases, no specific statutory duties may be triggered, but employers should strive to treat employees consistently in responding to these types of concerns.
Employers should ensure that their accommodation policies and practices address these issues fairly and in accordance with their legal obligations pursuant to applicable human rights legislation. As we noted in our Quick Reference Guide for Employers, human rights commissions across Canada have published policy statements and general principles regarding COVID-19 and an employer’s human rights obligations. Human rights commissions within Canada have provided very clear guidance that employers should be sensitive to a variety of factors affecting an employee’s ability to attend the workplace such as caregiving responsibilities or pre-existing health problems (for example, if the employee has a compromised immune system). See, for example, Alberta’s guidance here.
Employers should consider developing a decision matrix regarding employee objections to returning to the workplace so that legal risks are identified and the employer complies with its legal objections in responding to all such objections.
Looking ahead: Adjustments to policies and contracts as a result of COVID-19
In conjunction with addressing workplace safety issues as described above, it will be important to consider what workplace policies and practices need to be updated, supplemented or replaced as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition to adapting workplace health and safety polices to the “new normal” as described above, employers should consider if any of their policies need to be updated. For example:
-
Travel: Earlier in the year, we saw many employers scrambling to amend their travel policies to provide for travel restrictions and quarantine periods. These types of policies will continue to be important in the coming months, especially as countries start reopening their borders and business and personal travel resume.
-
Time off: Most employers' sick policies do not sufficiently address considerations related to COVID-19. For example, time off during quarantine periods should be expressly addressed. Time off policies should be clear on whether leaves of absence will be paid or unpaid. Various provinces have introduced amendments to job protected leaves as a result of COVID-19 and employers’ policies will have to be adjusted to comply with these amendments.
-
Work from home: As described above, working from home is likely to be a tool that employers use to maintain workplace safety going forward. Work from home policies should address mandatory and optional work from home arrangements (as applicable) and considerations related to security, privacy, and acceptable use of company equipment. Whether any current work from home arrangements will be time-limited to the current situation involving COVID-19 should be expressly set out in the employer’s policies.
Employment contracts should also be reviewed to ensure they appropriately address various issues which the COVID-19 pandemic has brought to the forefront, such as temporary layoffs. Employers may also want to consider whether their employment contracts have effective termination clauses, especially in light of recent important court decisions (such as those discussed here), as well as provisions regarding changes to duties, compensation, and work location.
Credit:
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, Brian Thiessen, Kelly O’Ferrall, Catherin Hammill and Lindsay Hofer (via Lexology.com on July 23, 2020)